Building Academic Vocabulary Review Games Part Two

I like to use games to review concepts and skills.     They are highly engaging (as documented in Marzano’s The Highly Engaged Classroom ).   They promote student discourse.   As students play, they are constantly evaluating opposing players’ work because they are competitive and want to win.   They are generally fast-paced and can build a lot of review into a little bit of time.

In my last post ,  I shared a set of cards and directions for using them to play several different games (Draw Me and a couple of versions of Charades).    In order to add a little more variety to my vocabulary review, I have also created a version of Taboo.   Students play in table groups.   A “talker” is designated (I will do this by seat position within the group).   The talker tries to get the team to say the name of the word at the top of the card.   However, the talker can not use any of the words below the line.   You can download the set of cards by clicking Taboo

IMG_1529

Table groups will compete against each other to identify the most vocabulary words.    I will have them  play for a specified amount of time.   The group that identifies the most words in the game will be the winner (and will each get a piece of candy).

Building Academic Vocabulary – Review Games Part 1

I’m not sure if there is a kid alive who doesn’t like to play games.   Granted, they like some games better than others.   Given the choice of a game or not a game, though, they always seem to choose a game.   Marzano uses that fact as a key component in his recommended systematic approach to building academic vocabulary in Building Academic Vocabulary .

IMG_1511

As I said in my last post, I have been working to incorporate more instruction in academic vocabulary but need to do more regular review of the vocabulary.  To that end, I spent the last few days building a set of cards I can use in a couple of different games.  (You can download the cards by clicking on Charades )  I normally spend the last five to ten minutes of  class every day for some kind of review or as some kind of differentiated instruction.   These vocabulary games will go into that rotation.

 

Draw Me 

This is essentially a variation of Pictionary.   Students will work in table groups.  One student per group will be assigned to draw for a given round based on seat position.  ( I explain how I use seat positions in this post)  The drawer will get a cluster of terms that are related (eg., mean, median, mode).  He or she will draw pictures representing the words until the team guesses all of the words in the cluster.  When the team has guessed all of the words, the drawer stands and says “Got it”.   At that point, all other teams stop drawing.  The winning team gets a point.   Ideally, the game continues long enough for the drawer task to rotate through each member of the group.   In reality, I know there will be days when I just don’t have time for that, so the game will stop when time is up.   The winning team is the one with the most points.  (They will each get a piece of candy.)

I will have a set of cards for each table group and give the drawer the cards that are the cluster for their group.   I could do this by posting the words on the Promethean Board, but then I would have to ensure that everyone except the drawer was facing away from the board.   That seems like it would take more transition time than I want, so I decided to go with the cards.

Charades 

This can be played with two different variations.

Variation 1:  

Students stand next to their desks and act out the word card displayed using the document camera or Promethean Board.   Students get “think” time after seeing the word and then are told to act it.   This feels more like an activity than a game to me, so I will probably use this when I am shorter on time.

Variation 2:  

Students work with their table group.   A designated group member is the actor (the actor will be determined by seat position within the group – e.g., Deltas do the first round, Sigmas the second, and so on).  Each table group will be given a set of cards.   The actors stand in front of their table group and begin to act out the term.   When the team has guessed the term, the actor raises the term card in the air to indicate his  or her team has correctly found the term.    The first team to identify the term gets a point.   The team with the most points at the end of the allotted time is the winner.

 

 

Building Academic Vocabulary – Does It Really Matter?

“Teaching specific terms in a specific way is probably the strongest action a teacher can take to ensure that students have the academic background knowledge they need to understand the content they will encounter in school.”   Robert Marzano

For a long time, I thought about vocabulary in math much as I would think of language acquisition in early childhood.  Children learn language skills as they hear people speak and see the objects about which they are speaking.   I felt that using the correct vocabulary as I spoke and taught should be sufficient to build student vocabulary., but I was woefully wrong.   I could see it as I read student writing, explaining their thinking.   There were the obvious errors in which students reversed the verbal description of a division problem (12÷3 described as 3 divided by 12).   There were the cases were the incorrect term is used to describe something (using the word mean when they mean median).   There were the cases where they didn’t use math vocabulary at all.   This left me struggling to understand why some students grasped the vocabulary but too many of them didn’t.   Some of them were effectively communicating their thinking verbally and in writing while others were not.

IMG_1510Was this gap a gap in understanding or a gap in their communication?   It turns out, it was probably both.   Students who did not have a firm enough grasp of the vocabulary have significantly lower comprehension of academic content.   As shown in the graphic (taken from Building Academic Vocabulary by Robert Marzano and Debra Pickering), a student with no direct vocabulary instruction is at the 50th percentile in terms of ability to comprehend subject matter taught in school.   The same student has a comprehension level that has increased to the 83rd percentile after intentional, systematic instruction in the vocabulary.   It’s pretty clear that my students didn’t have a firm grasp on the academic vocabulary and this was negatively impacting their ability to fully grasp the math.   I needed to make a change.

Because Marzano’s results were fairly dramatic and were backed by research, I decided to follow the guidelines he set forth.

Step 1:   Provide an  explanation or example of the term. 

You can do this a lot of different ways (a field trip, a video, a picture).    I usually do this with a Frayer model in which I have provided some examples and some non-examples.   You can download the Dilation  shown.

IMG_1508

 

I  have students do a Think-Pair-Share on the things they “notice” and “wonder” about the examples and non-examples.    This gives everyone some individual think time and a chance to talk about what they are seeing before we talk about it as a whole class.    As we debrief the notice/wonder, students start to construct a definition.   I refine that definition if I need to at the end of the discussion.

 

Step 2: Students restate the description in their own words

Next, students put the definition that the class generated in their own words and write in the “definition” box of the Frayer model.   Their definition does not have to be perfect and complete but it should be error-free.   I walk around and look over their shoulders as they do this to make sure they are doing OK.   If they are really struggling, they can skip to step 3 and then come back to this step

Step 3:  Students construct a picture or graphic representation of the word

Students create a visual representation of the word.  I have students do this in the illustration box of the Frayer model.   This makes them process the concept in a non-linguistic way.   Sometimes, this is fairly straight forward and they can just draw the actual thing.   Sometimes, it is less so and they might have to come up with a symbol to represent the word.  They can also draw an example or a dramatization of the term

Step 4:  Engage students periodically in activities that help them add to their knowledge of the term

This is really important.   It was OK that the initial definition they wrote.was not “complete”initially because they are coming back to it and building additional knowledge.   They can then add the new knowledge to their definition.   Students might highlight a word part (eg., ob- in obtuse to make a mental link to the ob in obese).   They might identify synonyms or antonyms.   They might add another picture or graphic.   The might add a note about a common confusion or misconception.

Step 5:  Ask students to discuss the terms with each other every so often

A think-pair-share activity works really well for this

Step 6:  Have students play games using the terms periodically

Marzano has an entire chapter of activities that you can use for this in Building Academic Vocabulary

My initial reluctance to “teach” vocabulary in math boiled down to a reluctance to give up “math” time for “vocabulary” time.   I have come to realize that the vocabulary time is part of the math time.   I have also discovered that it really does not take very much time.  As I look back on where I have come on this issue, I can see that I have done pretty well incorporating the first five steps over the last few years  but not as well with step 6.  That is one of my goals moving forward.

I have some of the other vocabulary Frayer models that I will be using with my 7th grade students this year available for download below.

IMG_1500

yintercept

IMG_1501

Transversal

IMG_1502

Translation

IMG_1503

slope

IMG_1504

rotation

IMG_1507

function

IMG_1509

Congruent

IMG_1506

Hypotenuse)